Kinship care in Norway: why placements with family and close networks can reduce trauma, what authorities assess, and why equal support and written reasoning are critical.
Kinship care (fosterhjem i slekt og nettverk) means placing a child with relatives or trusted people in the childβs close network instead of with strangers. Many children prefer this option because it preserves identity, culture, and continuity β but only if the assessment is fair and the support is real.
Important: This article is educational and not legal advice.
What βfamily and networkβ placements can look like
- Grandparents, aunts/uncles, adult siblings
- Close family friends, neighbors, godparents
- Trusted adults in the childβs environment (e.g., coaches, mentors)
Why authorities must assess kinship options early
Norwegian practice and guidance emphasize that when a child cannot live at home, the child welfare service should always explore whether someone in the childβs family or close network can provide a safe placement. This is about minimizing disruption and preserving the childβs relational world.
Assessment topics that often decide the outcome
- Safety and capacity: Can the carers provide stable daily care and protect the child?
- Role boundaries: Can carers cooperate with child welfare while resisting harmful pressure from adults?
- Contact and loyalty conflicts: Will the carers support healthy relationships (including safe contact with parents)?
- Culture and language: Especially important for minority children and cross-border family networks.
Support and compensation
A recurring problem is when kinship carers are treated as βsecond tierβ foster parents β expected to do the work without the same training, guidance, or economic terms. Do Better Norgeβs view: if the state places a child, the state must support the placement.
Do Better Norge perspective
- Family preservation first: Kinship care can reduce trauma when removal happens, but it should not become an excuse for weak reunification work.
- Bias awareness: Network carers can be unfairly rejected due to class, disability, minority background, or βnon-standardβ family structures.
- Written reasoning: If kinship options are rejected, demand a clear written explanation of why and what evidence was relied upon.
Official resources
Practical tip: Ask the caseworker to document that your family/network has been mapped, who was contacted, and the reasons for any exclusions. This helps prevent silent βnoβ decisions.
No comments yet. Be the first to start the conversation.