URGENT: Every voice matters — Reunite these families /// Supervision in Foster Care (Tilsyn i fosterhjem) /// URGENT: Every voice matters — Reunite these families /// Supervision in Foster Care (Tilsyn i fosterhjem) ///
S
← Back to Wiki

Supervision in Foster Care (Tilsyn i fosterhjem)

Explains municipal supervision of children in foster care (tilsyn), what good oversight looks like, common failure modes, and where to find official guidance.

Definition

\n

Tilsyn i fosterhjem is the municipality’s independent oversight of a child’s daily care in foster care. The purpose is simple: to make sure the child is safe, heard, and receiving forsvarlig omsorg (adequate care) in practice — not just “on paper”.

\n\n

Who is responsible?

\n
    \n
  • The municipality where the foster home is located has the overall responsibility for planning, carrying out, and following up supervision.
  • \n
  • A designated supervision person (tilsynsperson/tilsynsfører) should meet the child, talk with them, and document concerns.
  • \n
  • Foster parents must allow access to the home and provide information necessary for supervision (see foster home regulations).
  • \n
\n\n

What good supervision should include

\n
    \n
  • The child’s voice: Private, age-appropriate conversations without foster parents present when needed.
  • \n
  • Safety and wellbeing: Sleep, food, school, health care, mental wellbeing, and signs of neglect or conflict.
  • \n
  • Relationships and identity: Connection to siblings, extended family, language/culture, and the child’s life story.
  • \n
  • Contact (samvær): Whether contact is happening as decided, and whether practical barriers are being used to reduce it.
  • \n
  • Documentation: Clear written notes, concrete observations, and follow-up actions with deadlines.
  • \n
\n\n

Common failure modes (Do Better Norge perspective)

\n
    \n
  • Box-ticking supervision: Visits happen, but the child’s lived experience isn’t captured, and concerns are softened in writing.
  • \n
  • Lack of independence: Supervisors may rely too heavily on the foster home’s narrative or the child welfare service’s framing.
  • \n
  • “Nothing to report” culture: Small signals (fear, loyalty pressure, isolation, somatic stress) are missed until harm escalates.
  • \n
  • Contact erosion: Practical choices (transport, timing, supervision rules) gradually shrink contact and later get used as “proof” the bond is weak.
  • \n
\n\n

Practical actions for parents and allies

\n
    \n
  • Ask in writing for who is the supervision person, how often visits occur, and where reports are stored.
  • \n
  • Request that the child is spoken to alone when appropriate, and that the report includes the child’s own words.
  • \n
  • Submit specific concerns with dates and facts — and ask for a written response with follow-up steps.
  • \n
  • If supervision fails, consider escalation to Statsforvalteren (State Administrator) for oversight of municipal duties.
  • \n
\n\n

Official guidance and references

\n\n

React & Share

👍 | 👎 0 dislikes Log in to react
Share:

Comments (0)

You must be logged in to comment Login

No comments yet. Be the first to start the conversation.

Sign Our Petition