A practical guide to foster care compensation in Norway: what it includes, why documentation matters, key agreements, and how to reduce instability caused by unclear funding.
Foster care compensation (fosterhjemsgodtgjΓΈrelse) is the financial framework for foster parents in Norway. It typically combines (1) a payment for the work/availability of foster parents and (2) reimbursement for the childβs day-to-day expenses. In practice, municipalities can vary in how they set levels and document decisions β which makes transparency essential.
Important: This article is educational and not legal advice.
What compensation usually includes
- Basic fee / remuneration: Compensation for the foster parentsβ work and responsibility.
- Expense coverage: Reimbursement for the childβs costs (clothing, activities, equipment, etc.).
- FrikjΓΈp (release from ordinary employment): In some placements, one foster parent may be expected to be home full-time or part-time; this should be clearly regulated and documented.
Why written decisions matter
Compensation decisions affect stability. If a placement is underfunded or unclear, the foster family may struggle to meet the childβs needs β or the child may experience unnecessary moves. Do Better Norgeβs position is simple: everything that affects the childβs daily life must be documented, reasoned, and reviewable.
Key documents to request (or insist on)
- Foster home agreement (fosterhjemsavtale) and attachments (economic decisions, follow-up plan, contact plan, etc.).
- Written decision describing the remuneration and expense model, including any frikjΓΈp periods and criteria.
- Clarification of what is covered as expenses vs. what is expected to be paid by foster parents.
- Procedures for adjusting compensation when the childβs needs change.
2026 note: pension compensation when foster parents are βfrikjΓΈptβ
Bufdir states that foster parents who are released from work (frikjΓΈpt) should be compensated for lost occupational pension accrual, planned to apply from 1 January 2026, with expectations that municipalities prepare implementation in advance. This matters for long placements and for fairness in recruitment.
Do Better Norge perspective
- Predictability: Children need stable placements; stable placements require predictable economic terms.
- Transparency: Municipal variation should not create βpostcode justiceβ where children receive different support based on municipality.
- Separation of incentives: The economic model should never push decisions toward removal or long-term placement without proper reunification efforts.
Official resources
Tip: If you disagree with a compensation decision, ask for the legal basis and the written reasoning. Keep everything in writing.
No comments yet. Be the first to start the conversation.